|
My
research interests include social network analysis, the role of the corporation in
society, theories of the firm, and stakeholder management.
|
Does Relational Context Matter? An Empirical Test of A Network
Theory of Stakeholder Influences Researchers
have theorized that the relational context surrounding an organization and its
stakeholders impacts dyadic organization-stakeholder relationships. Using social network
analysis techniques and data from two stakeholder networks, this study empirically tests
whether network density and focal organization centrality influence how organizations
respond to their stakeholders expectations. In addition to providing evidence that
the relational context is important for understanding stakeholder relationships, the
results yield several implications for stakeholder and corporate social performance
research. |
Email
for a copy. |
TOP |
|
Redundant
Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel
and Semiconductor Industries
(with Dean Behrens and David Krackhardt) |
Network researchers have argued
that both relational embeddedness characteristics of relationships and
structural embeddedness characteristics of the relational structure
influence firm behavior and performance. Using strategic alliance networks in the
semiconductor and steel industries, we build on past embeddedness research by examining
the interaction of these factors. We argue that the roles relational and structural
embeddedness play in firm performance can only be understood with reference to the other.
Moreover, we argue that the influence of these factors on firm performance is contingent
on industry context. More specifically, our empirical analysis suggests that strong ties
in a highly interconnected strategic alliance network negatively impacts firm performance.
This network configuration is especially sub-optimal for firms in the semiconductor firms.
Furthermore, strong and weak ties are positively related to firm performance in the steel
and semiconductor industries, respectively. |
Email
for a copy. |
TOP |
|
Institutional
Investors: Blurring the Lines between Stakeholder Groups
(with Kimberly Bates) |
In our paper, we present a model
of how the rise of institutional investors can change the way we think about stakeholder
management and corporate governance. Peter Drucker focused our attention on the shifting
"of the titles of ownership of public companies to the institutional trustees of the
countrys employees." (1991:53) He suggests that this shift of ownership from
small dispersed blocks to concentration under institutional control has profound
consequences for the way business is done. We create a model of institutional investor
action which explicates how, why, and when institutional investors will take action to
govern managerial decision making to the benefit of shareholders. Moreover, the rise of
institutional investors blurs the boundaries between shareholders and other stakeholder
groups. This overlap presents new grist for prescribing how stakeholders should influence
managers and predicting how managers will respond to different institutional investor
actions. |
Email
for a copy. |
TOP |
|
The Consequences of Defining Social Issues: Policy Instrument
Selections and the U.S. Tobacco Industry |
Despite the existence of issue
management models, some issues still produce unanticipated outcomes. This paper examines
the influence of issue interpretation on policy instrument selections, arguing that the
perceived severity and cause of a social issue impact the government tool selected.
Relevant events in the tobacco industry are examined. |
Email
for a copy. |
TOP |
|
Relationships
and Reciprocity in the Investment Banking Industry: Rational Calculation or Inertia?
(with Stan Li) |
Scholars argue that network
structures serve as information brokerage mechanisms with respect to available alliance
partners and their capabilities as future allies. That is, a firms "cumulative
pattern of cooperation" is its source of (and constraints on) information used to
make partner selections. However, the overall pattern of the relationship structure only
indicates whether each pair of actors in a network has had previous alliances, and if so,
how many. Merely relying on past ties to predict future alliances suggests that
relationship decisions are driven by inertia. In our analysis of the investment banking
industry and the relational network surrounding Initial Public Offerings, we examine how
reciprocity behaviors in past ties influence future alliance decisions, and what types of
reciprocity are necessary to encourage organizations to form alliances with past partners.
We ask two questions: Does a partners degree of reciprocity in past ties influence
whether an organization will invite the partner in subsequent alliance opportunities, and
under what conditions is reciprocity balanced or imbalanced between partners? |
Email
for a copy. |
TOP |
|
|
|
|